In the upcoming Lok Sabha elections, the electorate comprising aam
aadmis and aam ladies has an important decision to make; both individually
and collectively. Our decisions as voters will either haunt us for the next 5
years (or more) or spark the beginning of a turnaround in the nation’s
fortunes. This piece attempts only to analyse and address the dilemma of the
common voter and is meant neither to promote or glorify nor to criticise or run
down any political party or person.
As we near the poll dates, no single party or pre-poll alliance seems to
have a realistic chance to cross the magic number of 273 in the Lok Sabha of
545 seats. The biggest concern to any government formation is a hung
parliament. Parties make claims of achieving a majority in public to rally
their troops, but remain skeptical in private. In case of a
fractured mandate, closed door negotiations for cobbling together a compromise
government will commence and the principles of honesty and integrity which all
parties swore by during their election campaigns will be ‘kept on hold’. By
accommodating too many incompatible constituents, the government’s hands would
be tied behind its back as it will need consensus of coalition partners for
anything it plans to do. It is therefore critical that a single party or
combination is voted to power and that too, with a reasonable majority. But
with 545 constituencies across 29 States and elections spread over a five week
period, it is impossible to predict how the electorate would vote.
An interesting factor is that these elections will have an estimated 15
crore first-time voters; primarily youngsters. Thanks to the social media there
is significant awareness in the younger generation about the ground realities
and issues facing the nation. They are also smart enough not to blindly support
a particular party or a leader. The extent of voter turnout is also critical
for an election. When people have strong sentiments – positive or negative –
about the incumbent government or other burning issues, they usually step out
to vote in large numbers. In such cases, their votes are also likely to be
concentrated in a specific direction and not scattered. A lower voter turnout
usually benefits the incumbent government and vice versa.
Coming to the contestants, these elections have four major ones…
Congress led United Progressive Alliance (UPA), National Democratic Alliance
(NDA) led by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), the Third Front and the Aam
Aadmi Party (AAP) led by Arvind Kejriwal. Most of the other parties are
regional parties or fence sitters who will cling on to any combination that
forms the government.
The UPA is unlikely to return to power thanks
to its never ending list of scams, policy-paralysis, sheer high-handedness and
brazenness. People seem to have grown weary of the UPA’s misrule and are
anxious for a change. Even in their few months in power, as many as six scams
have been exposed by the media! The first family of the Congress has also been
involved in controversies which the UPA leaders either defend or deny. And all
through this, we haven’t heard anything from the PM, who has silently presided
over this government over the last 10 years.
The reluctant prince is making all the right noises, to appeal to the
masses that he is the agent of change the nation desperately needs. But while
he preaches sermons of honesty and makes lofty promises, his party continues
its merry ways and practices something altogether different! He has always
shirked executive responsibility and has no administrative experience. He
finally agreed to become PM in a highly improbable UPA-3, but his first TV
interview in 10 years may actually end up discouraging people from voting for
the UPA!
The Third Front is a disjointed combination of parties with very little in common, who
have joined forces ostensibly to keep the corrupt Congress and the communal BJP
away from power. However, most of these parties have at some time in the past,
aligned with governments led by the Congress or BJP. The Third Front has more
generals than soldiers and each party leader nurses a secret but impractical
desire to become PM. With only 100 odd MPs in the present Lok Sabha, it is
unfair to expect them to muster 272+ seats. And even if they somehow manage it
– with outside support – it is anybody’s guess how long they can stay together,
given their internal contradictions.
The Third Front is therefore an unrealistic alternative, being incapable
of mustering the numbers to offer a stable government. The Third Front can hope
to form the government only if the UPA is routed (like in 1989) and offers them
outside support to keep the NDA out. The stability of such a government will
always be suspect, with the Damocles’ sword of withdrawal of support hanging
over their heads (like in 1990-91). And one hasn’t yet attempted to fathom the
quality of governance this motley group can jointly offer!
The people whole heartedly supported the AAP as a party with honest intentions, echoing the common man’s voice
against corruption and bad governance. Their courage in taking on the big
daddies of politics inspired the working class and younger generation to join
or support them. AAP made a stunning debut in the Delhi assembly elections,
knocking out many heavyweights. But within two months, they resigned and
abdicated their responsibility towards the people of Delhi. However, AAP is
confident that its selfless act of giving up power would benefit them in the
Lok Sabha elections. Time will tell if they are proven right.
AAP is still a fledgling party without a deep and wide organisational
network in many States. So while AAP will certainly make a debut in the Lok
Sabha, it cannot be expected to win 272+ seats in these Lok Sabha elections.
AAP will surely eat the votes of mainstream party candidates, leading to a few
tight contests or upsets. But having contested the elections on the issue of
corruption of ALL political parties, AAP won’t align with any other party, as
they had initially declared in Delhi. So unless they change their stand, AAP
won’t play a role in government formation.
Nevertheless, AAP should continue its good work on the ground more
responsibly, without the histrionics and public relations gimmicks. AAP’s
constant criticism of everyone in their way - at times without credible
evidence - gives them the image of person who claim to know the way but who
cannot drive the car. India cannot afford failure of AAP as an experiment of
change and one can only hope that in the years to come, AAP will consistently
and significantly increase its tally to be able to influence decision making on
important legislations affecting the common man.
And now we come to the NDA. Narendra Modi,
NDA’s PM candidate, is a strong personality with a long track record as Chief
Minister of Gujarat. His detractors routinely challenge the development in
Gujarat and blame him of fudging the data. The UPA, with all the government
databases and machinery at its disposal could easily have called Modi’s bluff,
but haven’t been able to do so for over 10 years. That surely means something,
right?
The UPA and others still blame him for the Gujarat riots despite the
Courts expressing a contrary view. All these years till the Court’s ruling,
they kept saying that the law will catch up with Modi, but now continuing with
their rant are questioning the Court ruling itself. They also say Modi is a
polarising figure who won’t practice inclusive politics and the minorities
won’t feel safe and secure. For them, there isn’t much difference in ‘inclusive
politics’ and ‘vote bank politics’. But the question to be asked is whether 66
years after independence is not adequate for previous governments to bridge the
social and economic gaps between the various communities?
Modi is perhaps the most charismatic and articulate leaders in the BJP
and has tremendous mass appeal. He is often criticised for his dictatorial
attitude, but single mindedness of focus and some amount of bull dozing your
way is at times necessary for successfully completing any formidable task. If
Gujarat has made some progress under a ‘dictator’ like Modi, it is an
experiment worth implementing at the Centre. Today India needs a stable
government led by a strong and decisive leader who commands respect at home and
incapable of being taken for granted by other nations, especially the
unfriendly ones. He should ‘rule’ as well as ‘govern’ with an iron hand and
lead India to becoming a ‘welfare state’. Other than Modi, there isn’t any
leader who answers that description. I would be happy to be corrected on this.
Once we convince ourselves that no one is in politics for selfless
public service, ‘whom to vote for?’ becomes more of a pragmatic decision of making a choice based on
assessment of the prevailing circumstances and alternatives available. The NDA
is not exactly God's gift to India, but seems to be the best option available
today.
No comments:
Post a Comment